Ron,

Actually, The more I read, the more I am  "sold" on
the TT-2000 and the TT-2200 with the reduction drive. 
The big selling point for me is less chance of a crank
failure/ more efficent prop.  Will the tt-2000 fit my
Great planes motor mount?  What are the listed prices?

Dann Johnson,
Thompson, Iowa

PS.

http://www.homebuilt-aviation.com/components.htm

The point that Scott was making about the Type I VW ?
HMMM : 
It looks to me like the web page below says Type I .  

http://usa.vw-engines.com/
 Cut and paste from that web page.
" PSRU Drive
"Texas Twister 1800"
This engine based on the type 1 VW engine produces an
incredible 200ft lb + Torque and with 85 Horsepower
driven through our Helical Gear Drive will surely give
your Aircraft what it needs up front.
Double Angular contact Thrust Races ensure Propeller
Forces are adequately isolated from the crankshaft
Oil Cooler Included with every Engine.
Factory Tested on 100 LL prior to shipment.
Weight 85 kg"


--- krnet-requ...@mylist.net wrote:
Scott, 

Ron Slender asked me to post this regarding the
wording on his web page.

Scott,

Looking at the article written on our web site it does
say type 4  not type 1 as mentioned by yourself. (Type
1V  shown as roman numerals )
We say in that article that 100 hp and 200 ft lb + of
torque is what you need up front. If it were wrong I
would change it but it isn`t.

The KR was designed for a 60 hp vw direct drive
engine.
The aircraft now is being fitted with nearly twice
capacity engines of various manufacturers and yet the
prop diameters are restricted to the original design
of undercarriage.

Why????
Those that do increase prop diameter end up with a
more efficient  airplane. It is then a matter of
matching performance with diameter and pitch.

There is no advantage using our 100 hp gear drive
engine in a KR unless you can swing a 60 inch diameter
prop.The advantages then would be a much shorter take
off run, most likely significantly better climb out
and probably a more economical cruise mode due to
higher prop efficiency attained by being able to use a
more efficient diameter propeller.

Gear driving an engine optimises a unique condition
allowing  the engine to reach maximum power and yet
deliver more efficient propeller rpm.
It gets better too,  NO prop forces acting directly to
a crankshaft, no thrust forces acting on the
crankshaft in unison to prop and power loading and an
engine that is designed to run at an rpm range as
accustomed as were in a car.

Individual aircraft operation is what the pilot
enjoys. Most who own one want optimum cruise against
fuel economy and the cruise is set accordingly. 
Those that want to light up the sky  can do that too.
An RG TT 2200 EFI running a 60 X 70 inch pitch prop
would most likely do that too in a KR2.

Ron  Slender

---------------

Phil Matheson


Reply via email to