30" Diehl gear legs.  Larry and I have the only two sets.

Jeff Scott

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:24:38 -0400 "Brian Kraut" <brian.kr...@engalt.com>
writes:
> 68" diameter?  What kind of gear legs do you have?
> 
> Brian Kraut
> Engineering Alternatives, Inc.
> www.engalt.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: krnet-bounces+brian.kraut=engalt....@mylist.net
> [mailto:krnet-bounces+brian.kraut=engalt....@mylist.net]On Behalf 
> Of
> Jeff Scott
> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 4:54 PM
> To: kr...@mylist.net
> Subject: Re: KR> glide rato..
> 
> 
> 
> That's probably just the compression ratio.  They typical Cont and 
> Lyc are
> pretty low compression.  The O-235 on my Tomahawk and O-200 on my KR 
> have
> both been upgraded to high compression pistons.  They are very stiff 
> to pull
> against the compression.  At tiny bump in the compression ratio 
> makes a huge
> difference in the way it feels when you pull the prop through.  I've 
> heard
> that referred to as "the engine has good rubber".
> 
> I would bet that the O-200 on my KR won't windmill at glide speeds, 
> even
> with the 68" diameter prop that I use.
> 
> Of course if you're referring to the bearings being tight, that's 
> an
> assembly issue, but that would also show itself via oil pressure 
> and/or
> metal in the oil filter/screen in very short order.
> 
> Come back for the spam can guys: Tell them that theirs would be 
> tight too if
> they had any compression.
> 
> Jeff Scott
> Los Alamos, NM
> 
> -- "Al Friesen" <nesei...@telus.net> wrote:
> All,
> I have been told in the hangar group that my VW Revmaster is way too 
> tight.
> All the conts and lyks are easier to turn over than my VW.  Any come 
> backs
> on these Spam can guys. ?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Golden, Kevin" <kevin.gol...@churchdwight.com>
> To: "'KRnet'" <kr...@mylist.net>
> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 7:15 AM
> Subject: RE: KR> glide rato..
> 
> 
> >A windmilling prop does more than disturb air over the airframe.  
> A
> > windmilling prop will cause a huge amount of drag that is NEAR 
> equal to
> > the
> > rotational disc of the prop.
> >
> > Not to worry.  I haven't seen a VW or corvair windmill.  Lycoming 
> and
> > Continentals will.
> >
> > Kevin.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dennis Mingear [mailto:dennisming...@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 9:02 AM
> > To: KRnet
> > Subject: Re: KR> glide rato..
> >
> > If the prop stops in a horizontal position it will
> > disturb the airflow over the wing, making it seem
> > smaller than it actually is, this will reduce the
> > planes L/D.
> >
> > If the prop stops vertically the airflow over the wing
> > is not disturbed and you have more effective wing
> > area, producing more lift, which improves the planes
> > L/D.
> >
> > If the prop is windmilling it is intermittantly
> > disturbing the airflow over the wing which is hurting
> > the wings ability to produce lift and hurting the
> > planes L/D.
> >
> > Denny ...
> >
> > --- "Kenneth B. Jones" <kenbjo...@cinci.rr.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Perhaps the stopped prop is less drag because it's
> >> stalled.
> >>
> >> Below is data taken from my flight test.  My idle
> >> setting was about 800 to
> >> 900 rpm, a little high, at the time.  Speeds are
> >> indicated knots.  My plane
> >> stalls at about 50 knots indicated so I didn't check
> >> the glide below 60 kts.
> >> Surely the ratio will start back the other way
> >> before it stalls.  I have a
> >> KR-2 with Diehl wings, 3 blade Warp drive taper
> >> blade 58" prop set at 19.5
> >> degrees at the tip, A65, empty weight is 623 lbs.,
> >> full fuel is 14 gal and I
> >> weigh about 180.
> >>
> >>       Glide
> >>       Speed Descent Distance Glide
> >>       kts ft/min NM/1000 ft. Ratio
> >>       60 400 2.50 15.18
> >>       65 442.5 2.45 12.93
> >>       70 525 2.22 11.73
> >>       75 625 2.00 10.56
> >>       80 750 1.78 9.39
> >>       85 800 1.77 9.35
> >>       90 900 1.67 8.80
> >>       95 1100 1.44 7.60
> >>       100 1500 1.11 5.87
> >>
> >>
> >> BTW, Bill's 2.5 miles per 1000 ft altitude is a
> >> glide ratio of 13.2 : 1 (if
> >> I calculated correctly).
> >>
> >> Ken Jones, kenbjo...@cinci.rr.com
> >> Sharonville, OH
> >> N5834, aka The Porkopolis Flying Pig
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Barry Kruyssen" <k...@bigpond.com>
> >> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net>
> >> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 6:31 PM
> >> Subject: Re: KR> what a day./ glide rato..
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message ----- From: larry flesner
> >> I doubt if a stopped
> >> > propeller is going to triple that number
> >> >
> >> > A stopped prop actually produces less drag, don't
> >> know the reason but have
> >> > tried it in self launch gliders (without
> >> feathering the prop) both idling
> >> > engine and stoped, there is noticeably less drag
> >> when the prop was
> >> > stopped.  Also it is better for the prop to stop
> >> vertically so any
> >> > vortices from the prop don't upset the air flow
> >> over the wing, so I'm told
> >> > but I couldn't tell the difference :-)
> >> >
> >> > regards
> >> > Barry Kruyssen
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________
> >> Search the KRnet Archives at
> >> http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> >> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to
> >> krnet-le...@mylist.net
> >> please see other KRnet info at
> >> http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> >>
> >
> >
> > "I can train a monkey to wave an American flag. That does not make 
> the
> > monkey patriotic."
> >
> > Scott Ritter
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > _______________________________________
> > Search the KRnet Archives at 
> http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to 
> krnet-le...@mylist.net
> > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> > *The information contained in this message may be confidential 
> and/or
> > subject to legal privilege, and is for the use of the intended 
> addressee
> > only.  Any unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of the 
> information
> > in this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
> message
> > in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this 
> message.*
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________
> > Search the KRnet Archives at 
> http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to 
> krnet-le...@mylist.net
> > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.8/22 - Release Date: 
> 6/17/2005
> >
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> 
> 
> _______________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> 
> 

Reply via email to