>
>> So you were 4300' AGL and were able to glide 6.5 miles and make a safe
>landing, is this correct?
>> At what height and distance out did you deploy the flaps.
>
>That's what they told me, but that was to HSV, not to HUA where I actually
>landed.  Bill Clapp told me his glide ratio was 2.5:1, so maybe that's the
>number you're fishing for.  I didn't drop the flaps until I knew I could
>make the runway, maybe a quarter mile out and a few hundred feet up.
>Mark Langford
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Mark,

Glad you kept your head straight and handled the situation like you did.

As to the glide rato, some quick math would indicate you did much
better than 2.5:1 as Bill indicated and I suspect his glide is much 
better than that also.

Assuming you only had a 4 mile distance, 4300 feet AGL, and no
wind I compute the following:

- approx 2 1/2 minutes in the air at 90mph would give you approx
a 1650 fpm decent rate which sounds about right to me.  That's
assuming a straight line decent with no altitude left at the landing
site so I think you did better than that.  I'm going to say you had
a bit better than 5:1 glide which also sounds about right to me.
Anything better than 4 miles, turns, altitude left (you used flaps),
etc., would only improve the rato.  The other biggest variable
would be the wind and either a head wind or tailwind could change
the numbers considerable.
[ 90mph=1.5 miles per minute so 4 miles = 2min36sec]
[ 4 miles = 21120 feet / 4300 = 4.9:1 rato ]
[4300 / 2.6 minutes = 1650 fpm ]

- At a 2.5:1 rato you would have gotten 2 miles distance using
the same assumptions and one hell of a decent angle.

- I've never performed glide test with the prop stopped but at idle
power I see decent rates in the 500 to 700 fpm range at approx
75 to 80 mph.  I doubt if a stopped propeller is going to tripple
that number and my wingspan is actually 4 inches shorter than
a plans built KR2 wing.

- Whatever rato you got, we're all happy you had the altitude
you needed !!!!!!!

As always, your results may vary.  

Larry Flesner



Reply via email to