Mark,
I'm not sure I understand.
How would that reduce the parts count?
What is the function of the anti-crush spacer?
Serge Vidal
"Mark Langford" <n5...@hiwaay.net>
Envoyé par : krnet-boun...@mylist.net
2005-05-24 18:31
Veuillez répondre à KRnet
Remis le : 2005-05-24 18:31
Pour : "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net>
cc : (ccc : Serge VIDAL/DNSA/SAGEM)
Objet : Re: KR> WAF application?
Jerry Morris wrote:
> but would the strength be affected by butting the wood spar ends and
> moving the
> WAF outboard just enough to put the attach bolt thru the outer spar with
> a anti-crush spacer in the outboard
That's about how my next one will be. I've seen that in an old
Newsletter,
and Steve Trentman with the turbine built his that way. It looked a lot
better, at least, and with proper spacers like you mentioned, would reduce
parts count and put the joints in double shear rather than single shear.
Mark Langford, Huntsville, Alabama
see KR2S project N56ML at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford
email to N56ML "at" hiwaay.net
_______________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
