The trouble is, what I get is different from the KR2 Scale 1 drawing. The KR2 profile is slightly thicker.
What the hell is wrong here? ++++++++++++++++ Hey mon ami There is not much wrong - your airplane flies great - no? The RAF 48 (according to my software) is 14.96% at 30%Ch or 182.43mm for the 1912.2mm (48") section. When I measure this dimension in Auto Cad it comes out at 182.43mm - 0.09 diff, so it should be correct? Max camber of 2,93% falls at 40% Ch. Steve J
