>     I am in the process of changing my 6 x 30 inch speed brake.  It has
12, 2" holes in it.  It does ok in terms of slowing the KR down, but it
doesn't do much to lower the nose attitude on approach.  Has anyone
compared the two type of SB with respect to nose attitude on approach?  If
so, please enlighten me.
>RV
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Is your wing incidence set to 3.5 degrees per the plans?  To get a
more nose down attitude on approach you need to add more drag.
My brake (9" X 30") gives me a nice over the nose view all the way
down to the flare.  I loose the view when it drops into a three point
attitude.  That much drag also gives me a rather high decent rate,
somewhere in the neighborhood of  800 or 900 fpm.  I carry a bit
of power until I get close to the numbers and then I cut the power
and attempt to slow it down another 5 to 10 mph before I get into
ground effect or it floats forever.  I approach at 80 smph indicated.

The size of the brake is determined mostly by the ground clearance
you have.  I have plenty with my 30 inch gear legs but even then my
brake comes close to tall grass. Tri-gear might be to an advantage here. 
Moving it forward would help some with the clearance but I'm not sure 
how it would affect handling.  I'm inclined to want to keep the drag 
forces behind the center of lift to help stabilize the aircraft rather
then in front of the center of lift.  If the drag loads are balanced side
to side and basically centered and parallel to the direction of travel
you probably don't have a problem.  The brake behind the center of
lift and C.G. would be acting more like a "drogue chute"(sp?).  At
least that's how my pea sized brain pictures it.  Your brain could
very well be larger and give you an entirely different view. :-))

As to which type of brake is better, the one with the most drag.
Now all we have to do is figure out which one that is.  Maybe
a test rig hanging out the car window could tell us.  Anybody
up to that?  Better yet, maybe one of the engineer types could
just give us the answer.  I did a quick search on the web and
looked in the Tony Bingalis books but no luck.


Larry Flesner



Reply via email to