Open up one of the larger Briggs & Stratton lawn mower engines and you'll
see that they have now opted for NO bearings whatsoever, just aluminum rods
on steel crank. Also running an aluminum block. Always wondered whether this
was just a built in engine replacement scam.
Doug Rupert
Simcoe Ontario

-----Original Message-----
From: krnet-bounces+drupert=sympatico...@mylist.net
[mailto:krnet-bounces+drupert=sympatico...@mylist.net] On Behalf Of Brian
Kraut
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 9:30 AM
To: Orma Robbins; KRnet
Subject: RE: KR> Engine Bearing

The material that they make the bearings out of is not that hard.
Apparently, using the aluminum case as the bearing with an oversize hub
works to some degree.  The biggest problem is that you have to change the
whole crankcase when the bearing surface wears out.  I am certainly not
suggesting that anyone do this on their engine.

I remembered hearing about an engine at one time that was made to use
aluminum beraings so I did a search and found that it is common.  I coppied
this from an article I found on bearings:

BEARING MATERIALS

At the original equipment level, the use of aluminum main and rod bearings
is growing for a variety of reasons. One is that aluminum bearings are less
expensive to manufacturer than bimetal or trimetal copper/lead bearings.
Switching to aluminum also gets rid of lead, which is an environmental
concern for manufacturers. But there are many other reasons, too.

"Federal-Mogul provides both copper/lead and aluminum bearings. But
perceptions are changing with respect to aluminum versus copper/lead," said
Federal-Mogul's Ron Thompson. "Most of the original equipment manufacturers
are going to aluminum bearings, as are a growing number of rebuilders in the
aftermarket. Many people are switching to aluminum because it provides
improved durability and better control over tolerances.

The whole article is here in case anyone is interrested:
http://members.aol.com/carleyware/library/ar797.htm


Brian Kraut
Engineering Alternatives, Inc.
www.engalt.com

-----Original Message-----
From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net]On
Behalf Of Orma Robbins
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 9:05 AM
To: KRnet
Subject: Re: KR> Engine Bearing


"for even suggesting"
Morning John;
Like I said, having two open cases side by side was interesting.  I lifted
out my crank and sat it inside the type 2 case, and sat the other crank
still with the bearing installed into my type 4 case and the fit was nearly
exact.  For me that varified that the builder intended to omit that bearing.
It looks like the prop hub was made to be the exact size that the case is.
With the Force One bearing the case is opened to accept the bearing.
Tomorrow I will go to the airport and get my mic and measure the prop hub
diameter and compair it to the diameter of the #4 crank bearing on the type
2 crank.

Orma L. Robbins Southfield MI
19 Years flying KR-2 N110LR
http://www.aviation-mechanics.com


_______________________________________
to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html




_______________________________________
to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html


Reply via email to