K..your inspector may have some time but is not a proficient pilot..and
indications are he is a poor inspector..take heart and forget
him..bob..4200inst in T-6..usaf test.14000tt..

Kogelmann Christian - OS ETA wrote:
> 
> I thought I share the final authority check on my KR-2S/GPAS2180 plans
> build, taildragger, but with belly board.
> 
> After the paperwork check the inspector wanted to fly. It should be the
> inspectors first flight in KR.
> I wasn't keen on letting the inspector fly, but he insisted as he had more
> than 1000 flight hours on 80 different types including taildragger (PA18 I
> found out later). Pilot in command was the authority guy and I was the
> shivering passenger...
> 
> The airplane has 37:18 flighthours and 215 landings so far and here is the
> (problem-)report issued by our experienced pilot:
> 
> Take off:
> take off roll was initially stable once the tail was off the ground at about
> 30kts the airplane veered to the right.
> We departed the runway at about 40 knots to the right and into 2in of slushy
> snow.
> However the airplane still accelerated and he yanked it of the soft ground
> at 50kts.
> The inspector was upset with the aircraft and recommended to "do something"
> with the ground handling.
> 
> The flight:
> -)we did some normal stalls at around 46kts-ok
> -)we did stalls at 45° bank angle - scary but ok you can still hold
> direction and the airplane does not fall on its back
> -)we did slips - all ok and maneuverable
> -)flat turns - ok
> -)directional stability - ok
> -)static longitudinal stability - trimmed to 90kts and moving the stick and
> let go will decelerate or accelerate the airplane to destruction -
> conclusion unstable - not ok
> -)dynamic longitudinal stability - trimmed to 100kts moving the stick 2in
> forward and 2in aft and then let go will induce
> increasing up-down motion with the stick moving after the 3rd motion into
> full down and you end up with negative G (oil pressure light came on and
> everything not tied down flew up)
> not acceptable - unstable
> otherwise the inspector was impressed by the performance of the little bird.
> He recommended to install a elevator spring to stabilize the stick and
> therefore stabilizing the plane.
> 
> After we finished our program we dove under the clouds, and the countryside
> covered with white snow looked the same everywhere we looked...it took us 15
> minutes of finding the 655m long asphalt runway in amidst off all the white
> surfaces.
> 
> Landing:
> I told him that I do long stabilized approaches at "exactly!!" 70kts and
> between 1800 and 2000 RPM.
> He did a short approach between 70 and 80kts.
> Flare was very high as he is not used to a very low KR.
> We bounced 3 times and went all over the place with the left gear ending on
> the left outer barrier of the runway and the airplane slid sideways. And
> stopped without a full ground loop (I guess it was a half loop)
> 
> His comment - I guess we did not break it....and think about improving the
> ground handling characteristics
> I was mad, under shock and my mouth was extremely dry and I did not get
> final certification as I need to sort out the longitudinal stability issue
> eg. installing a Spring loaded stick.
> 
> My conclusion, after my training with a former Air Force pilot for about 70
> landings I am halfway capable of landing the little bird on my 655m (approx
> 1900ft) home airport. My landings are (please don't flame me) 3 pointers or
> something similar
> and I (120 flight hours experience + glider time) would have done a better
> job than my professional inspector.
> However the belly board is a huge improvement when landing on a short strip
> 655x30m (1900x90) its worth its weight in gold.
> 
> I hope I didn't bore you too much but it shows if you don't know the plane
> you can have all sorts of take off and landing problems in what the
> inspector called "Giftnudel"-KR.
> 
> Cheers
> Christian
> OE-VPD
> http://www.members.aon.at/oevpd
> 
> _______________________________________
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html

Reply via email to