I have the same problem. I have found Dan very easy to talk to, but the 
simple fact is that most of the companies supplying for the homebuilt 
market do not produce installation manuals that are appropriate for the 
first time builder. "Simply put it together" doesn't cut it. When I wrote 
manuals years ago, I had them reviewed by house wives who were not 
interested in what I was doing. Until they could easily understand what I 
was saying, AND wanted to try it, the manual was not done. Dan makes a good 
product, as does Great Plains, but both would save a great deal of support 
time and irritated buyer reactions if they would provide manuals that 
prevented comments like Mike's. Such manuals are not that difficult, nor 
much longer than those supplied. Step by step instructions, along with 
diagrams or pictures, at each stage of construction would help. The KR2 
would be a simple plane to build if anything was defined properly and 
worked as advertised.

At 07:39 PM 7/22/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>So I just spent the last couple of months ripping out my retracts, putting 
>in a Diehl gear assembly, foaming and glassing the resulting holes and 
>today I put my Matcos on only to find that the camber between the wheels 
>isn't even remotely close. I sat there in a very pissed off mood measuring 
>and re-measuring again only to find that the lower gear brackets do not 
>share the same angle formed between the gear leg and the axle. As a matter 
>of fact, it turns out that between the two, they're several degrees off 
>(about 4 degrees). For those of you messing around with gear geometry at 
>this point in your life, you know that this is a lot of degrees. I can't 
>understand this - it never occurred to me to check this prior to bolting 
>them to the gear legs. In fairness to the people at Diehl, I bought the 
>assembly second-hand, but it obviously was not damaged. And judging from 
>what I see on the web, it sure looks like a Diehl assembly. Moreover, a 
>shim is really not going to work very well - a quick computation with my 
>CAD program indicates that a 4 degree tapered shim behind the axle is 
>about .210 thick. I'm just sick about this mess. Anybody out there got any 
>clever solutions short of ripping my plane apart again?
>
>Mike Meyer _______________________________________________
>see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html

Larry Severson
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
(714) 968-9852
lar...@socal.rr.com 

Reply via email to