>Hi,
>Does anyone know if a KR2 or a KR2S could be built within the CAA’s
>microlight definition... 

I don't think so because of the stalling speed criteria. If the designers
quote the stalling speed at say 52 mph ( regardless of actual figures for
individual aircraft / loadings etc.) I think that the CAA would use this
figure, and unfortunately it's quite a way off your target.
I have perhaps one of the lightest tri-gear KR2 's built in the UK ( for
which I can take no praise as I bought the plane built and proven ), and it
is officially registered as a Rand KR2 (modified) , the 'modified'
basically referring to the way that an extra glazed area behind the cockpit
has been incorporated into the turtle deck. This for me adds to it's
appearance, but also reduces weight a little also. Like most KR2 a/c on the
UK PFA/CAA register, we are under the 990 lb MTOW figure you would need,
although I'd rather be above it anyway to make it a true 2 seater with more
fuel !
Email me offline and I can send you a jpg / gif photo of G-BTGD ( or see it
on the CAA site under the G-INFO search
http://www.caa.co.uk/srg/aircraft_register/ginfo/ ) to get an idea of what
it looks like. Are you ruling out building and flying it under PFA rules in
the UK ?
Perhaps a guy to contact would be Colin Hayles, who flew his KR2 from the
UK to Australia, and is currently co-ordinating modifications and drawings
for UK KR2 aircraft in the UK.

Phil Spurr
phil.sp...@btopenworld.com



Reply via email to