I will add one more thought here. In many...not all small aircraft the wing
are just wont lift the weight it would take to break it in NORMAL flight .
As stated by the previous indivdual...aerobatics adds another and lighter
number to normal gross weight.
I am new to KR aircraft as well and have spoken with some very
knowledgeable folks on here and I plan to use a general number they have
expressed and minus 5% to be extra careful until I understand her needs and
my ability with my KR2 grows.
Doran
On Aug 19, 2016 7:46 AM, "n357cj via KRnet" <krnet at list.krnet.org> wrote:
> Gary,
> I have N357Cj placarded at 1250# but I also lowered the G rating to +4 g
> and I don't remember the negative number right now. but in any case I don't
> feel it is simply a gross weight decision.
> Joe Horton
>
>
> Subject: KR> KR2S gross weight question
>
> I've been researching this for a little while but am not finding any real
> info. What are KR2S builders using as their gross weight? I'm looking at
> tri-gear and Corvair engine.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options
>
