My first engine in my kr was a hapi. Crank broke at about 65 hrs. Prop left the 
plane. Funny feeling. Made it to a pasture. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 17, 2016, at 11:39 AM, svd via KRnet <krnet at list.krnet.org> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion of the Revmaster crank and prop hub Mark.   
> Why?  Any other suggestions? Heads?  
> 
> It does seem a shame to rip apart the HAPI, but I keep getting ominous 
> opinions of its airworthiness.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Apr 17, 2016, at 9:00 AM, krnet-request at list.krnet.org wrote:
>> 
>> Send KRnet mailing list submissions to
>>    krnet at list.krnet.org
>> 
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>    http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>    krnet-request at list.krnet.org
>> 
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>    krnet-owner at list.krnet.org
>> 
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of KRnet digest..."
>> 
>> 
>> Today's Topics:
>> 
>>  1.  94x82 vs 92x82 (svd)
>>  2. Re:  94x82 vs 92x82 (Mark Langford)
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:31:56 -0700
>> From: svd <osprey220 at yahoo.com>
>> To: "krnet at list.krnet.org" <krnet at list.krnet.org>
>> Subject: KR> 94x82 vs 92x82
>> Message-ID: <BF6418A0-E0FE-476C-834D-6E8D0FC63510 at yahoo.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>> 
>> 
>> Is there any downside to moving to the 94mm cylinders vs 92mm's?  My son?s 
>> project currently has the 92x82 for 2180cc.  I can move to 94x82 for about 
>> the same cost as sticking with 92x82 in an upcoming rebuild. 
>> 
>> I?ve read that the 94mm cylinders are preferred because they are thicker 
>> walled.  
>> 
>> I am considering a pretty serious rebuild of the HAPI engine that came with 
>> my son?s KR project.
>> 
>> Specifically, we are intending to replace the crank and prop hub (with GP 
>> Top Bug and Force One), cylinder heads (with ?), alternator with GP, and 
>> cylinders with nikasil?s (not the LN Nikies).
>> 
>> Since the case will have to be machined to accept the Force One prop hub, 
>> shouldn?t be too much more to machine for the 94?s.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Owen
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------
>> 
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 20:28:53 -0500
>> From: "Mark Langford" <ML at N56ML.com>
>> To: "'KRnet'" <krnet at list.krnet.org>
>> Subject: Re: KR> 94x82 vs 92x82
>> Message-ID: <6657B9D418D943CE96CBB3D7C757FBFD at BASE755>
>> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="us-ascii"
>> 
>> Owen wrote:
>> 
>>>> Is there any downside to moving to the 94mm cylinders vs 92mm's?  My son's
>> project currently has the 92x82 for 2180cc.  I can move to 94x82 for about
>> the same cost as sticking with 92x82 in an upcoming rebuild.<<
>> 
>> Several of us are running 94mm cylinders on the Corvair with no problems at
>> all.  You'll probably go through at least two sets of VW heads before you
>> need to touch the pistons/cylinders.  They are well proven.  I put 550 hours
>> on a set in N56ML and they still look great and have great compression.
>> 
>> I've built two GPASC engines (and torn them both down several times for hub
>> issues), and if I were going to build another VW, I'd use the Revmaster
>> crank and prop hub setup instead.  
>> 
>> Mark Langford
>> ML at N56ML.com
>> http://www.n56ml.com 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------
>> 
>> Subject: Digest Footer
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> See KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html
>> KRnet mailing list
>> KRnet at list.krnet.org
>> http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------
>> 
>> End of KRnet Digest, Vol 4, Issue 100
>> *************************************
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options


Reply via email to