I keep reading that the 92 is the thinnest wall, with 94mm thicker, but less landing area between the cylinder and the deck as well as precious little metal between the bore and the cylinder head bolt holes.
Is this wrong? Is it important? I can get a Nikasil cylinder/piston sets for ~$400 from the UAV company I consult for. I think they are form QSC - which I believe also supplies GP and Aeroconversions. The weight savings is striking, and so is the 2X increase in heat transfer. I have no direct experience - so I?m soaking up any advice and all I can read. Thanks! Owen > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 14:14:00 -0500 > From: Tommy Waymack <5blindate at gmail.com> > To: KRnet <krnet at list.krnet.org> > Subject: Re: KR> KRnet Digest, Vol 4, Issue 100 > Message-ID: > <CANwmPb20O3HupqLN54Bvi0ELLaCRFemyHrePaV_-G1b4qKfJfw at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > The 94 is thinner than the 92.Revmaster crank setup is different than the > HAPI and GPAS.All are good just different.Use the one you like.Tommy W. > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:39 AM, svd via KRnet <krnet at list.krnet.org> > wrote: >
