> Why would you want to put out a speed brake outside a normal > circumstances or landing. Why not just reduce the rpm. And lift the > nose. Side slip. Landing is more fun without flaps. But they are good to have. >PHIL Matheson. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Mark Langford might best answer that. He flew his current KR2 without speed brake and then added one. As for me, I was uncomfortable on the first approach to landing on the first flight of my KR. The KR was too slick and needed some drag to help stabilize the approach. I went back to altitude and tested the speed brake down to a full 90 degrees and up to 30 degree banks to simulate the landing pattern. The added drag with a touch of power helps to stabilize the approach, especially in speed control. Full down is standard procedure for all my landings since then. The brake is really nice when coming in over some trees at a grass strip. After clearing the trees I can cut power to idle and point the nose down to the runway and gain very little speed until I flare. I would guess I'm saving 500 feet of runway until the touchdown point. I would not enjoy landing the KR nearly as much without the speed brake. I suspect most people flying a KR with the brake or drag producing flaps will voice a similar opinion. Larry Flesner
