What I said was what I was taught many decades ago, not an inference.
If you know otherwise, so be it.   I have no intention to get into a 
pi--ing contest with anyone over this or anything else.  I am not the FAA.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Yes, lets not get in to that type of contest.  At my age I no longer 
have the equipment to  participate.   It was not a personal attach so 
no need to get  defensive.

This thread started with a poorly stated question, that being a 
"whiskey compass".  There is no requirement for a "Whisky" compass ( 
or wet compass) , simply a "magnetic direction indicator".  To be 
absolutely correct  the fluid is alcohol, kerosene, or some similar 
substance.  I was not replying to wet, dry, or any other type, but to 
your reply (stated below) assigning requirements to a compass 
(magnetic direction indicator) that simply are not stated in the 
regs.  If you were taught many years ago that the qualifications 
stated below are requirements then I would infer that your were 
instructed incorrectly.  No fault of the student.  As a final note, a 
wet compass can fail.  I have 4 dry compasses in the garage and a 
refill kit in the tool chest to recover from such failures.

Larry Flesner

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>My understanding is that the intent of a (wet) compass requirement 
>is as a last resort/emergency/always available navigation tool - 
>with the fluid serving as a dampening influence compared to a dry 
>compass with no dampening.  In order for any other type to qualify, 
>there must be no external power needed to make it operational. 
>Therefore, unless one of the magnetometers you have researched will 
>always operate reliably without externally supplied power, then no, 
>I can't agree.
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



Reply via email to