Chris Prata wrote:

>> I think it would be awesome to gather everybody's real world
experiences regarding the basic specs. I agree that the original
probably isnt 385lb empty,takes off in 300ft, does 200mph, climbs
2000fpm, costs $53 to build, all on a 1100cc bug engine!<<

At the moment, the closest we can come to that is the KR Info 
spreadsheet at http://www.krnet.org/kr-info.html.  You will notice only 
one KR1 listed.  There just aren't that many of them out there.  There 
are a few flying, but the owners have not volunteered the information to 
more fully populate the chart.  There's probably some performance data 
in the old Newsletters, so that's worth a look 
(http://www.krnet.org/newsletter/).  I know there are a lot more flying 
KRs of all generations out there, but these are all the numbers I've 
been able to elicit over the years.  More input would be welcome, of course!

 >>...what are real-world experiences: TOP SPEEDTAKEOFF/LANDING
DISTANCESTALL SPEEDEMPTY WEIGHTCEILINGRANGEBEST PROP*<<

Landing and takeoff distances are a little more difficult to get than 
stall, speed, and ceiling, as it's helpful to have an outside observer 
to identify touchdown points and takeoff points.  And like the other 
numbers we try to gather, all are subject to inaccuracies, errors, and 
outright inflation.

 >>One side note that I noticed from reading the newsletter pilot
reports, one factor which makes a HUGE difference, is a propeller. I
saw reports of huge changes in speed, climb, fuel burn etc with
different props which interestingly seem to load up the engine
equally. I saw no other factor that had as much impact on the flight
experience as propeller.<<

Props are important, and there's a lot more to them than diameter and 
pitch.  Blade area and shape are big factors as well. Another factor is 
"cruise vs climb"...it depends on what the pilot's need or preference is.

A 52x52 from one prop maker may bear no resemblance (in shape OR 
performance) to a 52x52 prop from another maker.  And sometimes, a prop 
maker can't even produce the same performance from a prop even when he 
has an identical one to copy!  I'll leave it at that, but props are a 
bit of a crap shoot, and when you get a good one, consider yourself 
lucky...and make a copy!

Mark Langford
ML at N56ML.com
http://www.n56ml.com


Reply via email to