Joe wrote made very good points about ironing out the problems during 
taxi testing.  That's invaluable, and I did that as well, although I 
didn't realize it until reading Joe's post.   I did about 70 "tail-up" 
runs down the runway to get familiar with the transition from flight to 
tail-down configuration, and I think it prepared me well.  Others have 
said it's crazy to do that...that you're just opening yourself up to 
damaging the plane, but I think these tests, one-after-the-other, are 
invaluable.  I went out early and went first down 360, did a u-turn, and 
back down 180, listening to the radio, announcing what I was doing,  and 
looking for traffic before each run.  You can knock out a lot of taxi 
tests in a hurry that way.  The Corvair never cared about the CHTs, but 
you should keep an eye on that kind of thing.

Of course there are lots of "first flight" checklists and guidelines out 
there for the first flight itself.  For the actual first flight in a KR, 
Rick Junkin's work is a good one, but I'm not sure he ever used it to 
fly a KR (correct me if I'm wrong).  For KR first flights,  a NO WIND 
situation is the smart way to go. Do it early in the morning or late in 
the day, but you don't want the sun in your eyes during landing.... I 
can tell you from last weekend!   KR's are not your average spam can, 
and tend to float forever, especially without a belly board or flaps.  
The more time you are gliding along above the surface, the more 
susceptible you are to gusts and "bumps", and you will be moving faster 
than your C-150 experience has taught you to deal with.  But even before 
landing, you need to get up in the air and determine the INDICATED speed 
at which the plane stalls, flaps or belly board deployed.  Whatever you 
do, you'd better be inches over the runway when you reach that speed 
while landing, although ground effect will add some safety margin. First 
landings are always best made at a very long runway with plenty of room 
for burning off speed.  Most conventional wisdom is do make your 
approach at something like 15% -20% higher, than stall speed but that's 
a little fast for KRs.  There have been a lot more KR pilots have 
problems trying to land too fast, as opposed to stalling on first landing.

Jim Faughn wrote a pretty good work on first landings, and it's at
http://www.krnet.org/faq/chapter11/faughn/perfect_landing.html .

Mark Langford
ML at N56ML.com
http://www.n56ml.com

-----------------------------------------------



Reply via email to