>...the kr2s should actually have a >smaller cg range than the kr2. This is because the kr2s has a shorter mean >aerodynamic chord. 15% to 35% mac is a smaller range on the kr2s than a >kr2. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Where is the center of lift on the new airfoil compared to the RAF48 and won't that determine where the CG should be located? Just asking. Larry Flesner