I think it is normal to move the engine forward about 2".  It may have
something to do with the Diehl skins being a bit heavier than the stock
wings, or just that almost, if not all, KRs are being built much heavier
than the design weights published.

I believe that Jim Faughn had his 2180 forward 2" and think that he had
stock wings.

See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics?

Peoples Choice at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il ? MVN 
Best KR at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il ? MVN 
Best Interior at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il ? MVN 
Best Paint at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il ? MVN 
Best Firwwall Forward at 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il ? MVN 

Daniel R. Heath -?Lexington, SC



-----Original Message-----
From: KRnet [mailto:krnet-bounces at list.krnet.org] On Behalf Of Sid Wood
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2014 12:34 PM
To: krnet at list.krnet.org
Subject: KR> Diehl Wing Skins & CG

Not sure if there is some adverse CG consideration in using the Diehl wing
skins on a KR-2 such as on my airplane.  My KR-2 seemed to have that aft CG.

I don't have any definitive data, but I have had to move my 2180 VW 2-inches
forward from the plans location to get a more stable CG.  Do the Diehl Wing
Skins tend to move the design CG aft?

Sid Wood
Tri-gear KR-2 N6242
Mechanicsville, MD, USA

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Gary Shubert wrote:

> What is the going thought on wing and tail incidence angles?  KR2 I am 
> going to use diehl wing skins and am planning to rebuild my tail with 
> the new airfoil coordinates.

The tailfeathers would still follow the plans, which is zero degrees to the
longeron, usually obtained with a 3/32" shim under the forward spar of the
horizontal stab.  Both the plans-built and "new airfoil" horizontal
stabilizers are symmetrical airfoils, so the same incidence applies to
either one.  The only reason it's different with the "new airfoil" is
because the wing airfoil templates are drawn with a little less incidence,
so the tail gets a little less to match it.

Even if you haven't installed the main wing yet, I'd still leave it stock
incidence.  Given my experience, which is you don't fly wide open at
straight and level but a small percentage of the time, the improved view
over the nose while landing is worth more than the tad of speed you might be
giving up...

Mark Langford
ML at N56ML.com
website at http://www.N56ML.com
-------------------------------------------------------- 





_______________________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html see
http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
options


Reply via email to