The plane really has no bad rep. It is usually the workmanship in the
building and/or the flying skills of the pilots that come under question.
Many of us often critique the KR but our remarks inadvertently come off as
disparaging. Please do not lose sight of the fact that the KR is a great
aircraft in the original form and again better with the many mods.
-----Original Message-----
From: Doran Jaffas
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 5:59 AM
To: krnet at list.krnet.org
Subject: KR> .KR BAD REP?
If this aircraft has such a bad rep as the previous mentioned then why have
so many been built and as a new owner should I be a bit concerned? I have
previously owned and did the testing on a Sonerai 2 . The .KR 2 seems like
a good step from there.
Doran
.kr2owner at gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
options
