Ok...I'll agree with that...just seems odd that they would use them as an example for cg. I ran across one article that said if the flyer had been stable the control surfaces were insufficient to actually control the plane...they actually used the instability to their advantage...of course nobody else at the time could fly it until they changed it.
https://sites.google.com/site/mykr2stretch/ https://sites.google.com/site/mykr2stretch/parts-for-sale On Oct 18, 2013 4:23 PM, "Larry&Sallie Flesner" <flesner at frontier.com> wrote: > At 08:23 AM 10/18/2013, you wrote: > >> Google wright flyer unstable and you'll find it. They did it on purpose. >> When asked their coined response was something like the pilot should fly >> the airplane. >> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++**++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > My only real point was that whatever the Wrights did does not discredit > the article about what we know to be true now. > > Larry Flesner > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at > http://tugantek.com/**archmailv2-kr/search<http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search> > . > To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > see > http://list.krnet.org/mailman/**listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org<http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org>to > change options >
