I haven't seen Larry's exhaust, but assume it somewhat resembles mine, since he 
copied what I did (with my encouragement). ?The easiest exhaust to build is a 
simple log that runs down either side of the engine. ?The problem with that is 
the two cylinders on each side have consecutive exhaust strokes, so one 
cylinder is always pushing it's exhaust right into the pressure wave from the 
other cylinder. ?That kills the power. ?Unfortunately, that is what is usually 
supplied on most production 4 cylinder aircraft. ?That's why PowerFlow has such 
a successful business supplying aftermarket STC exhausts for 4 cylinder 
aircraft. ?

The ideal exhaust system would be a 2 into 1 cross over system, so the flow 
from one helps extract the other. ?You'll read that the Continentals don't have 
enough valve overlap to take advantage of a crossover exhaust system, but that 
simply is not true of the O-200 as the O-200 cam has a significantly longer 
duration than the other small Continental engines. ?

Exhaust is all about flow, and getting the velocity of the exhaust flow right 
for your operating RPMs is what is going to make the engine perform. ?Bigger 
pipes are not necessarily the right answer either as too big of a pipe will 
slow down the exhaust flow making the cylinder work harder to push out the 
exhaust. ?I came up with an ideal length of 38" for the primary header pipe 
with an ideal ID of 1 3/8". ?Those numbers seemed to work pretty well for 
getting the exhaust out of the engine compartment and would be relatively 
simple to build as individual head pipes. ?Since I was welding this up to go on 
an already running engine, needed to fit it within the confines of my existing 
cowling and didn't have a jig to work with, I chose not to take on the task of 
trying to build a crossover 2 into 1 system. ?I went to the local cut rate 
muffler shop and bought 3 7' sticks of 1 1/2" OD mild steel exhaust pipe and 
had them put several random 90 and 45 degree bends into the pipes. ?Then I cut 
up the pipes and used the various bends and straight sections to tack together 
my exhaust pipes. ?As with building anything on an aircraft, everything is a 
compromise. ?I ended up with my pipes varying in length from 32 to 38 inches, 
which is less than ideal. ?However, there was no question that the new exhaust 
really gave the engine a significant boost in performance.

-Jeff Scott
Los Alamos, NM




> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> :
> >Why a 4 tube exhaust?
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> It lets the engine breathe a bit better and produce a bit more power 
> / higher RPM. If you could tune the pipes, even better. Tune, as in 
> match the length of the pipe to the length of the gas power 
> pulse. It helps extract more burnt gas from the cylinder and pull in 
> more air / fuel mixture. (more power)
> 
> I had a two into one on each side on my 0-200. Easiest setup 
> possible but very poor for performance.
> 
> Larry Flesner

Reply via email to