On Thursday 25 June 2015 19:19:18 R.Harish Navnit wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > If there are errors it means that there are more calls to KDE3/Qt3 > > functions... Not all KDE3/Qt3 methods are in headers prefixed with > > K3/Q3. This is reason why I wrote you to look at compiler defines and > > linker flags > > > Okay. There is however a small problem in doing so. > > The way I'm setting about removing these k3 classes, is by removing a > certain k3/q3 class from a protocol/plugin etc, and then checking build. > I'm trying to remove all occurrences of these k3/q3 classes one at a time. > For eg, in the groupwise, I've removed k3/q3listviews first. However, there > are still some k3 classes like k3listbox etc. So when I remove the support > libraries from the CMakeLists.txt, the build would definitely fail, no ? >
Yes, build will fail. > So, in order to avoid this, I'm thinking of removing all visible k3/q3 > occurrences first, from a protocol/plugin and then test again after > removing the support libs. What do you say ? > Sounds good. Do not remember that some defines enable additional KDE3/Qt3 member methods. So once you remove defines some other code does not have to compile... You need to port those methods too! > > Warm Regards. > > Thanking You, > R.Harish Navnit > The Enigma <http://harishnavnit.wordpress.com/> -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list kopete-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
