On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:07:38 -0200
Lamarque Vieira Souza <lamar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I do not think that is the problem, if LIBMSN_INBOX_URL_ENABLED is not
> defined when including wlmlibmsn.h the error message would be different. The
> linker thinks inboxUrl is a class method, not a signal, that is the problem.
> Dâniel, could you try recompiling again now just removing the #ifdef
> LIBMSN_INBOX_URL_ENABLED and the #endif but keeping inboxUrl at the same
> place
> (after newMailNotification signal). If it does not work, try adding a fake
Ok, I tried that (removing the #ifdef) and it worked.
> signal after inboxUrl to see what happens. I still think it is a
> compiler/liker bug, we need more test to figure out what is really happening.
So the whole problem is with the #ifdef? I mean, the "parser"
is not recognizing the ifdef and generates the error message?
Would it worth to write a small sample code to test those ifdef
statements? If so, and if it's really a compiler bug we could send to
gcc developers...
--
Linux 2.6.31: Man-Eating Seals of Antiquity
_______________________________________________
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
