Hi Em 31/07/2009, às 05:41, Dario Freddi escreveu:
> Hi Gustavo, > > In data giovedì 30 luglio 2009 19:04:24, Gustavo Boiko ha scritto: > : > Hi >> >> Thank you for notifying about that. >> >> Em 22/07/2009, às 09:24, Dario Freddi escreveu: >>> Hello guys, >>> >>> I moved KIdleTime to kdelibs/kutils right now, and you told me to >>> drop a line >>> here when this would have happened. The code is completely >>> multiplatform and >>> it would be nice to have less code duplication around, so I would >>> like to know >>> if you're still interested in using it. >> >> I'll try to give it a shot in the next few days. Let's see what >> happens. >> >> Just one small suggestion: wouldn't it be better to assign an id to >> each timeout added? I mean if two different parts of the code add a >> 500ms timeout, and after some time one of them removes the timeout. >> Will the code still notify the other 500ms timeout? > > The interval is already the ID. Actually, since the idle time is > always the > same, setting 2 intervals in the very same moment will end up in > having a > single 500ms interval, since both would fire at the very same time. Yes, I know they will fire at the same time. But my concern is if one of the timers added ask for removing the interval, will the other still fire? A refcount would probably do the job, but since there is a similar API for other timeout event, I thought it would be a good thing to keep it consistent. Cheers Boiko _______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list kopete-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
