------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120117
------- Additional Comments From taupter gmail com 2006-05-12 17:52 -------
Let me disagree with you.
By design the VideoDevice and VideoDevicePool APIs have a clear intent to
_never_ crash, even if by mistake methods are called in a different order than
intended and/or with absurd parameters. Please understand we're accessing
_hardware_ and issuing kernel calls, and that the video device is supposed to
be accessed concurrently. and doing try/catch exceptions it even uglier and
error prone than simply checking if a given QValueVector has elements. I would
be glad to discuss a better design pattern that meet the requisites and is
cleaner that the present one.
Take in account that the present code is a work-in-progress, so some things are
still settling and some proper thread-safe checks are still missing. If you
feel you can contribute please don't hesitate about contancting me so we can
coordinate our efforts.
_______________________________________________
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
