-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matt Rogers wrote:
> On Thursday 09 March 2006 00:23, Matt Sicker wrote:
>> Matt Rogers wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 08:59:57PM +0100, Olivier Goffart wrote:
>>>> Le Lundi 6 Mars 2006 14:48, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett a écrit :
>>>>> http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/03/06/1142235&from=rss
>>>>>
>>>>> http://developer.aim.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> "In the near future we will have solutions for LINUX, MAC and Windows
>>>>> Mobile devices"
>>>>>
>>>>> Matt, perhaps you can lobby to make liboscar the official
>>>>> implementation for Linux? :-)
>>>> http://developer.aim.com/faq.jsp#aimcc
>>>>
>>>> Q: Are there any restrictions on what I can build?
>>>> A: We tried to make the Open AIM Program as restriction-free as
>>>> possible, but in order to help protect our network and users, certain
>>>> rules apply. We have highlighted some below, but please refer to the
>>>> Developers License Agreement for details.
>>>> - Developers are not permitted to build Custom Clients that are
>>>> multi-headed or interoperable with any other IM network.
>>>> [...]
>>> Yeah, in short, this whole thing about Open AIM is complete crap from
>>> our point of view. So if anybody that works for AOL is lurking here,
>>> send me the protocol documenation. :)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> kopete-devel mailing list
>>> kopete-devel@kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
>> So, uh, are we allowed to view the code to look for protocol
>> specifications?  We won't need to use their code, just look for
>> incompatibilities and whatnot.  If they tried to sue, I'm sure they
>> wouldn't have any backing due to interoperability and other stuff.
> 
> There is no code for us to look at. All we get are COM interfaces, AFAIK. Not 
> to mention that according to their license, if somebody signs up, and then 
> uses this information for use in an open source client, that person is in 
> violation of the license, which opens up all kinds of legal ramifications.
> --
> Matt
> 
So, essentially, it's pointless?  What kind of shit is AOL trying to pull?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEEh8g5tcAKF5t41MRAvWeAJ41JviDN7ZRraQSEMESdITJb+GnXgCdHJUN
pJ68RytUD0R64BNhWNi+dSc=
=4w82
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel

Reply via email to