Tomas Cohen Arazi<tomasco...@gmail.com> wrote:
I propose we replace the current listing with (a) nothing or (b) some pie
diagram with companies/institutions contributions (git log, or what best
addresses the need) to the project.
Nothing is a little harsh. A tombstone would be better.
For example, "We no longer list support providers, as this list was being
used to exclude people from bidding on projects, and declaring themselves
official or registered partners when Koha never had such a program or
status. The list's purpose was to provide an easy list of people in various
countries, not give any status to them or statement of quality about them.
If you wish to see who is active in the community please search:
- bugs.koha-community.org for submissions and comments by that person or
company.
- dashboard.koha-community.org for people who demonstrate themselves active
in the community.
- and if you are technical, feel free to look through the git log of the
koha project cloneable from git://git.koha-community.org/koha.git
We apologize for any inconvenience, but such ongoing, gross
misrepresentations of the list required this list to be removed."
The problem with (b) is it still provides a way for people to misrepresent.
A variation on (a) in the only way.
GPML,
Mark Tompsett
_______________________________________________
Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
