Hi, On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Paul Poulain <paul.poul...@biblibre.com>wrote:
> well, last year way of calculating could result in the following : > * 100 ppl voted Argentina #1 and Nigeria #2 > * 90 ppl voted Nigeria #1 only > * none voted Argentina #1 or (Nigeria #1 and Argentina #2) > > Nigeria = 90*2+50*1 = 230 points > Argentina = 100*2 = 200 points > => Nigeria wins ! > > So yes, explaining how the results are calculated matters. And mirko > explained, I'm fine with any option, as long as it's clearly stated. And > it is. Thanks for clarifying. And I think that this example makes it clear that this particular voting scheme should never be used again for conference selection, as I can't see how such an outcome could possibly be justified absent an explicit "none of the above" option. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Manager of Implementation Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts email: g...@esilibrary.com direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366 skype: gmcharlt web: http://www.esilibrary.com/ Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org & http://evergreen-ils.org _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
