Liz Rea wrote: > I would like to point out that listing on the Koha Community web > site by any company does not confer any sort of "certification." It > merely means that a company has requested a listing, and met the > minimum requirements to be listed (the request represents a current > proffer of Koha services [1]). > [1] http://koha-community.org/support/paid-support/how-to-get-listed/
I see that "legitimate" was in the original proposal adopted at http://stats.workbuffer.org/irclog/koha/2010-05-05#i_434754 but seems to have got lost before making it to the page. Would the koha-community site really list (say) fraudsters who make a current proffer of Koha service? Does anyone mind if we reinstate that? I've added it to http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/General_IRC_Meeting,_2_August_2011#Agenda and seeing as I've opened the discussion, I've proposed Mason's suggestion from koha-devel on there too. Whether or not that's the case, who else (supporters or buyers) would be interested in a support provider mutual certification scheme and what would you want from it? Regards, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. http://koha-community.org supporter, web and LMS developer, statistician. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire for Koha work http://www.software.coop/products/koha _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
