Hi Galen,
Il 06/10/2010 14:29, Galen Charlton ha scritto:
I have a question about one of the changes to record.abs:
-melm 995$h ccode,item
...
+melm 995$8 ccode,item
Would this not break indexing of the ccode for existing UNIMARC users?
I think no. Why?
1) A 995 subfield for ccode (for Unimarc setup) is a new thing in 3.2. A
value for items.ccode is not present in file record.abs of 3.0.6
2)In 3.2 the en SQL Unimarc definition for items.ccode is 995$8
file
../installer/data/mysql/en/marcflavour/unimarc/mandatory/unimarc_framework_DEFAULT.sql
line 182: ('995', '8', 'Koha collection', 'Koha collection', 0, 0,
'items.ccode', 10, 'CCODE', '', '', 0, 0, '', '', '', NULL),
3)In 3.2 all fr SQL Unimarc defintions use 995$h for "code à barres,
incrémentation"
All french SQL definitions don't setup a subfield for items.ccode
file
..installer/data/mysql/fr-FR/marcflavour/unimarc_complet/Obligatoire/framework_DEFAULT.sql
line 2023: ('995', 'h', 'code à barres, incrémentation', '', 0, 0, '',
-1, '', '', '', NULL, 0, '', NULL, NULL, ''),
3b)In 3.2 all fr SQL Unimarc defintions don't use 995$8
4)In my wiki proposal of 995 for 3.2 Unimarc
<http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Holdings_data_fields_%289xx%29>
I inserted 995$8 for items.ccode.
So I think we can use 995$8 for items.ccode and connect index.
Bye
--
Zeno Tajoli
CILEA - Segrate (MI)
tajoliAT_SPAM_no_prendiATcilea.it
(Indirizzo mascherato anti-spam; sostituisci qaunto tra AT con @)
_______________________________________________
Koha-patches mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-patches
