Hi, On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Henri-Damien LAURENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My comment : Really good Idea, > even though I am not really keen on getting more and more tables without > a good MCD.
MCD? I don't recognize that acronym. > (There was one for 2.2 but it is not up to date for 3.0. Maybe QA > manager should/has to do it ;).... ) > But My Question : When ? > When are you planning to do that ? Is this Vital for Koha 3.0 features ? > Shouldn't this wait for 3.2 ? IMO, this should be done now, and I'm prepared to have patches done by tomorrow. I have observed at least one instance where Koha permitted more than one issue to be made for the same item, which a PK constraint on issues would have caught. There are already a number of blockers involving holds functionality that will require extensive work, and I expect that I will turn up more circulation bugs as I work through cleaning up holds. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Koha Application Developer LibLime [EMAIL PROTECTED] p: 1-888-564-2457 x709 _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
