On 19 March 2010 04:59, Nicole Engard <neng...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Galen Charlton <gmcha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> And not all people interested in development will read a manual. :) >> Some will, of course, but ultimately, we'll have to be sensitive to >> the fact that there will be a lot of paths for people to become Koha >> developers. In any event, my strong preference is to promote a method >> for developer documentation that encourages *direct* updates by the >> developers. > > And that is my plan as well :) To have developers be able to edit the > documentation at any time - which can be done by putting the XML file > up in a public git repo - just like Koha. But I'm up for suggestions > from all - like I said this was a project I was asked to do by only a > few developers - and I'm happy that now I have some public feedback > going on :) > I have to agree with Galen on this. Documentation is excellent, committees aren't :) I think a well structured section of the wiki would be my preference. Are you allowed to say who asked for the developer docs?
Chris _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
