I am 100% behind this idea. I have brought up the subject before. I think it adds more guarantees of quid pro quo.
Kyle http://www.kylehall.info Information Technology Crawford County Federated Library System ( http://www.ccfls.org ) On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:10 AM, paul POULAIN <paul.poul...@biblibre.com> wrote: > Hello, > > What do you think about releasing all our 3.2 improvements under AGPL ? > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl.html > > Summary: the AGPL makes mandatory to release source code even if your > software is an hosted one. > > The AGPL is compatible with Koha, as Koha is GPL v2 *or later* > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility (AGPL is > considered as a part of the GPL: > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#SeparateAffero ) > > Of course, everything already existing, that is under GPL would stay as it. > > I think it would be a good idea. Publishing the source code is not > enough (we all know that getting 400 000 lines of code without hint, > help and a git repo would be useless), but at least, that would clarify > our motives. > > cheers > -- > Paul POULAIN > http://www.biblibre.com > Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc > Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel@lists.koha.org > http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
