2009/9/4 Zeno Tajoli <taj...@cilea.it>: > Hi to all, > > At 14.40 03/09/2009, LAURENT Henri-Damien wrote: > >>After discussing in Yesterday's IRC meeting we have two options : >>a) test master AND reconciliation branch at about the same time which >>would double the work. But reconciliation branch could be already there >>(you can check it out from koha-maintenance/reconciliation) >> >>b) rework the reconciliation branch and come down to a simple bug fixing >>branch. > > > as CILEA we prefer the path a). For us is ok to test the present > koha-maintenance/reconciliation > with bugfix and same extra. > As soon as possibile I download it and test it as soon as possibile. > In fact we prefer to work on 3.0.4 > instead of 3.2 > Hmmm
I still strongly feel that 3.0.x is a maintenance branch and should only contain bugfixes. And that b is the much saner and safer approach. Doing 2 major feature releases at the same time will be a nightmare to maintan. IF there are features in 3.0.x that are missing in 3.2 they should be ported forward, we should not be bringing features back. Chris _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
