2009/6/17 Marc Chantreux <marc.chantr...@biblibre.com>: > hi Chris > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:21:52PM +1200, Chris Cormack wrote: >> If you are installing from git, then the dev mode is good. If you are >> installing from a release tarball then standard is what most people >> would use. > > I meant that i use git for production also because it's more quick and > easy to upgrade. I never used another method than the git one even in > production.
Sure lots of people do. But the average person who wants Koha for their small library probably runs off a release, not from git. > >> Dev mode is for people who are going to be doing updates, and rollbacks. >> Standard is for the majority of people who download a release, install >> it and leave it. > > Imagine you installed koha 3.0.0, if you want to take benefits from > patches (bug corrections), you are now in 3.0.2. I would like to use git > as a 'aptitude update' or 'windows update'. I see it as the best > practice and wonder if i missed unexpected and dangerous effects. > You can do that, but lots of people like to run from releases, and upgrade when a new release comes out. Standard mode is for them. It might be best practice for those people familiar with git, but lots of people do run from releases. Chris _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
