>> >> Maybe then in that case in order to no confuse first time visitors you >> need to put that the three people hired in that grandfathering have >> all since left liblime. > > Please don't re-write history.
What? So I do still work for liblime? I didn't resign? Wow, i guess im owed a pile of backpay then. I'm not sure what you mean here, it's totally accurate that neither Russel, Mason or I work for liblime, and havent since april last year. > >> >> >> >> >> >> the koha-manage group decided to... >> >> >> >> What are the factor making for someone to be in the Koha-manage group? >> >> There is no mention of such a group on koha.org. >> >> >> >> My main point here is that the Koha.org website should be as >> >> vendor-independant as possible. I really think that the Alphabetical >> >> order >> >> is the best way to reach that goal. >> > >> > I respectfully disagree. Listing by date joined is the most >> > vendor-independent and community-focused. Another fair option would be >> > to >> > list in order of contributions, most to least. This community is, after >> > all, >> > a meritocracy :). >> > >> The community is what the community decides it should be. > > I'm not sure I understand what you mean, Chris, could you explain? Do you > mean to imply that the Koha community is not a meritocracy? Koha, like the > Apache community has always represented 'Meritocracy in Action!' from my > POV. > I mean that no one person gets to decide what this community does, or how it decides things. Chris _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel