Hi, On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Ben Finney <ben+k...@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > But it also doesn't solve the incompatibility between the Koha manual, > licensed under GPL, and the Wiki content. > > Why not license the wiki content also under GPL? Then the same license > terms apply to all the software: programs, documentation, and wiki.
Good idea - the GPL seems to have worked OK for the manual. MJ and I discussed this a bit more on #koha yesterday, and MJ also suggested either the GPL or a free-for-all. For the sake of completeness, the other licenses that came up in the discussion include: CC-BY - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC0 - http://creativecommons.org/license/zero/ I now think that the GPL is the way to go. I've updated the relicensing page on the wiki (http://wiki.koha.org/doku.php?id=relicensing); are there any other comments about the license or the voting process? Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton VP, Research & Development, LibLime galen.charl...@liblime.com p: 1-888-564-2457 x709 skype: gmcharlt _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list koha-de...@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
