On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 19:31 -0500, Joshua Ferraro wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Michael Hafen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I looked at it briefly for a different field, and found my understanding > > of XSL lacking. Adding a column to the database was the quick solution > > for me. > XSL would also solve the specific problem you have, just turn on those > two sysprefs and walla ... >
Well, it's not actually that straight forward. I still have to learn how to read and modify an XSLT stylesheet. > > I guess I can take another look. It might be a good solution. My > > thinking is that it's good to see data from the two ( potentially > > different ) copies of the record, what's in the database columns and > > what's in the marcxml column. I'll have to look again at the XSL to see > > where it comes from too. > marcxml has a full MARCXML record blob representing the entire > bibliographic and item information for that record. XSL has the > advantage of being able to handle repeatable fields, wheras the > current database design for Koha can only handle non-repeatable > fields. > It did occur to me that the database can only handle non-repeatable fields. Luckily for me 245$b is non-repeatable in the Koha Default Biblio Template. Still I think it would be possible to handle repeatable fields, just concatenate the fields together with a seperator, but the database columns would have to be very large to do it right. That isn't really a good solution. At any rate I will take a look at the XSL files. This raises the question of how many others are interested in a patch to this end. Ryan may want to comment here as he has already stated that LibLime uses XSLT. Any others want to comment? > Josh > -- Michael Hafen Systems Analyst and Programmer Washington County School District Utah, USA for Koha checkout http://koha-dev.washk12.org or git://koha-dev.washk12.org/koha _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel