Joe Atzberger a écrit : > I find the fallback to firstname entirely regrettable and have argued > against it in the past. I am certain the only accounts in favor of it > were regarding small libraries where a firstname basis might make sense.
I disagree ;-) It's interesting for large libraries to be able to get the result they want when they enter "doe john". As entering just "doe" would result in a large result set. So I think it's useful for large libraries, more than for small ones ;-) However, i'm not against a change here, but I just care about the useability : atm, the behaviour is quite easy for librarians (except for the cardnumber=surname case i've already pointed, but it happends only once) A can I suggest a solution where the patron would be splitted in 2 parts : cardnumber or surname : _____________________ firstname : __________________________ that would result in a better SQL, and would not be a pain for the librarian. -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc NOUVEAU TELEPHONE : 04 91 81 35 08 _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
