Paul -- I think as long as the commit message identifies the target as 3.0-specific, there is not much benefit from a separate patches list for 3.0. I might defer to HDL on this, since he is the end recipient/manager of those patches, but I think the community of reviewers should be the same.
Since 3.0-specific traffic is likely to be small relative to HEAD's traffic, I don't think it is much of an imposition on the current list. --Joe On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Paul POULAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > atm, all patches are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > They are supposed to be relevant for HEAD. > but : how will we deal with patches that are 3.0 only ? > > For example : updates of the french translation. They are 3.0 specific, > and can't be merged in HEAD. > In a few weeks, I think we will have some bugs that are 3.0 only, and > irrelevant in head (due to some structure/code/features changes) > > so, how will we deal with those ? > I once suggested to have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailbox, this proposal has > not been accepted. But I come back with the general idea, as I think > it's something we will face quickly. > So, any idea welcomed... > > -- > Paul POULAIN > http://www.biblibre.com > Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc > NOUVEAU TELEPHONE : 04 91 81 35 08
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
