Galen Charlton a écrit : > Hi, > * More and better communication about LibLime's proposed enhancements.
++ > * Where appropriate, implementing a drastic change in the form of a > separate OSS project that can integrate with Koha, such as Biblios or > the acquisitions client that LibLime is working on The acquisitions client that LibLime is working on ??? I don't remember hearing anything about a new acq client before this mail. Could you explain a little bit more ? Isn't there a risk to overlap with what we are working on atm ? > * Where there are disputes about fundamental Koha architecture, > discuss them and compromise. One thing to keep in mind is that > LibLime's clients generally pay for specific features - nobody thus > far (and I predict, ever :) ), is likely to specifically want to pay > LibLime to rewrite Koha in Erlang or anything drastic like that. I'm sure I won't have any problem with that too. The client want a feature, he isn't interested how it is writen. > Of course, somebody could offer to RM as a "spare time" project, and > perhaps would be in a position to accept financial support as a sort > of second job. if so, great. Is anybody volunteering? meaningfull silence from "anybody"... > The one thing I don't think we should do is attempt to "hire" a RM > from outside of the community - for that person to have credibility, > he or she really must know Koha, be actively contributing to it or > have made significant contributions to the past, and ideally have a > direct interest in the success of the project, either by using Koha or > supporting Koha users. I agree it's not a good solution as well. Cheers -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : 04 91 31 45 19 _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
