Hello all,

in the blog Entry, I read : "The SSPL allows free and unrestricted use and modification, with the simple requirement that if you provide the product as a service to others, you must also publicly release any modifications as well as the source code of your management layers under SSPL. "

We are under "you provide the product as a service" so "we must publicly release any modification". But...

... we don't do any modification. Conclusion: there's no impact for us with this license change.

I'm like David : I don't think there's anything for Koha to worry about too.

Le 18/01/2021 à 23:41, dc...@prosentient.com.au a écrit :
Hi Zeno,

Thanks for sharing that Magento comment. That matches my understanding as well.

However, the Koha Community isn't redistributing ES Object Code. There's 
nothing stopping Koha implementations from using Elastic Cloud or any other 
Elasticsearch offering. So what Shay Banon says in 
https://www.elastic.co/blog/licensing-change appears to be accurate (albeit not 
very clearly worded at times).

I don't think there's anything for Koha to worry about here.

David Cook
Software Engineer
Prosentient Systems
Suite 7.03
6a Glen St
Milsons Point NSW 2061
Australia

Office: 02 9212 0899
Online: 02 8005 0595

-----Original Message-----
From: Koha-devel <koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org> On Behalf Of 
Zeno Tajoli
Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2021 9:03 AM
To: 'koha-devel' <koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org>
Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Elasticsearch changing licences

Hi to all,

I confirm the wrinting of David Cook.
In my Koha (with ElasticSearch)n installation ES is with present with 
Elastic-License, 
https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/blob/master/licenses/ELASTIC-LICENSE.txt

I think the situation is not clear and ambigus.
In theory we are a situation like Magento 
(https://github.com/magento/magento2/issues/31656#issuecomment-761296521).

I think we can ask (as Koha Comunity) a license to redistribute ES Object Code 
and same legal piece of paper that covers not only end-user
(libraries) but also firms that sell support, hosting an installation of Koha. 
In fact  as SasS.

Cheers
Zeno Tajoli

Il 18/01/2021 06:06, dc...@prosentient.com.au ha scritto:
After reading https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Elasticsearch#Install_elasticsearch, it looks 
like the Koha community is actually already using the "Elastic licence" since we're 
installing the compiled "binary" Elasticsearch rather than building our own Elasticsearch 
from the previously Apache 2.0 licenced Java source code.

Interesting that Elastic provides two download links: 
https://www.elastic.co/downloads/elasticsearch and 
https://www.elastic.co/downloads/elasticsearch-oss. Yet, the package manager 
instructions are the same for both, while the direct DEB downloads in both 
appear to be for different packages.

So if you look at... /usr/share/doc/elasticsearch/copyright, you'll probably 
find the Elastic License.

So... technically speaking the replacement of Apache 2.0 with SSPL is actually 
probably irrelevant for us since we're not modifying or building the source 
code. We're just using the compiled Java object/byte code.

Of course, that means our use of Elasticsearch has been with a free but 
proprietary licence. This SSPL change really just shines a light on the 
licensing for us then.

David Cook
Software Engineer
Prosentient Systems
Suite 7.03
6a Glen St
Milsons Point NSW 2061
Australia

Office: 02 9212 0899
Online: 02 8005 0595

-----Original Message-----
From: Koha-devel <koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org> On
Behalf Of dc...@prosentient.com.au
Sent: Monday, 18 January 2021 11:47 AM
To: 'koha-devel' <koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org>
Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Elasticsearch changing licences

That's interesting that you know Vicky, Thomas. That was actually the first 
article I read before posting to this listserv. It was interesting.

Thanks for that excerpt, Jonathan, although I think you have omitted a very 
important part where they define a service:

"""
Making the functionality of the Program or modified version available to third 
parties as a service includes, without limitation, enabling third parties to 
interact with the functionality of the Program or modified version remotely 
through a computer network, offering a service the value of which entirely or 
primarily derives from the value of the Program or modified version, or 
offering a service that accomplishes for users the primary purpose of the 
Program or modified version.
"""

Personally, I find the definition from 1.3 to be vague as "enabling third parties to interact 
with the functionality of the Program or modified version remotely through a computer network" 
or "offering a service the value of which entirely or primarily derives from the value of the 
Program or modified version" could really be interpreted a variety of ways. Not good.

If you read "1.3 Offering the Program as a Service" from the Elastic 
perspective, that text makes some sense. They're trying to prevent AWS (and other cloud 
providers) from providing Elasticsearch as a managed service, as they think that the 
competition directly impacts their own managed service business. MongoDB created the SSPL 
licence and started using it in October 2018. Of course, it seems that Amazon just forked 
the last AGPL version of MongoDB to create Amazon DocumentDB in January 2019 
(https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-amazon-documentdb-with-mongodb-compatibility-fast-scalable-and-highly-available/).
 Redis also changed some of its licensing a while ago: 
https://redislabs.com/legal/licenses/.

But, at this point, I don't think there have been any legal cases that actually 
test the SSPL. But it's still early days.

I suppose when considering products, we might want to consider the life of the 
product too. Here is a critical article on MongoDB's finances: 
https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2020/07/20/dont-chase-growth-with-mongodb/?sh=568631c64ef3.
 Perhaps the licence change won't be enough and they'll eventually be bought by 
a larger tech company.

No idea.

David Cook
Software Engineer
Prosentient Systems
Suite 7.03
6a Glen St
Milsons Point NSW 2061
Australia

Office: 02 9212 0899
Online: 02 8005 0595

-----Original Message-----
From: Koha-devel <koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org> On
Behalf Of Jonathan Druart
Sent: Friday, 15 January 2021 10:22 PM
To: koha-devel <koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org>
Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Elasticsearch changing licences

Thanks Thomas, great article.

It's what I thought this morning when I read their FAQ and the license, they 
don't mean the same.

The license clearly states:
"""
If you make the functionality of the Program or a modified version available to 
third parties as a service, you must make the Service Source Code available via 
network download to everyone at no charge, under the terms of this License.
[...]
“Service Source Code” means the Corresponding Source for the Program or the 
modified version, and the Corresponding Source for all programs that you use to 
make the Program or modified version available as a service, including, without 
limitation, management software, user interfaces, application program 
interfaces, automation software, monitoring software, backup software, storage 
software and hosting software, all such that a user could run an instance of 
the service using the Service Source Code you make available.
"""

That's crazy!

Le ven. 15 janv. 2021 à 11:47, Thomas Klausner <d...@plix.at> a écrit :
Hi!

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:11:20AM +0000, Hugo Agud Andreu wrote:

as far as I have understood we still could use as ES license is
still open, tha changes only affects to those that change the code
of ES that they will be forced to publish their own developments, as
Koha only uses API and none code modification is done, then no
problem with ussing ES
I haven't looked into the detail myself, but I know Vicky, and assume
that she spend a fair shair of thinking before publishing this:
https://anonymoushash.vmbrasseur.com/2021/01/14/elasticsearch-and-kib
a
na-are-now-business-risks

I'm using ES in a few projects, so I will have to consider if I just
freeze ES at the current version, and/or look for some alternatives
in the future. Or maybe they won't go through with the new license?
Or maybe it will be clarified how the license actually affects
projects just using ES.

Greetings,
domm

--
#!/usr/bin/perl                              http://domm.plix.at
for(ref bless{},just'another'perl'hacker){s-:+-$"-g&&print$_.$/}
_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : https://www.koha-community.org/ git :
https://git.koha-community.org/ bugs :
https://bugs.koha-community.org/
_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : https://www.koha-community.org/ git :
https://git.koha-community.org/ bugs :
https://bugs.koha-community.org/


_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : https://www.koha-community.org/ git :
https://git.koha-community.org/ bugs :
https://bugs.koha-community.org/


_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : https://www.koha-community.org/ git :
https://git.koha-community.org/ bugs :
https://bugs.koha-community.org/

--
Zeno Tajoli
System Librarian
_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : https://www.koha-community.org/ git : https://git.koha-community.org/ 
bugs : https://bugs.koha-community.org/


_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : https://www.koha-community.org/
git : https://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : https://bugs.koha-community.org/

--
Paul Poulain, Associé-gérant / co-owner
BibLibre, Services en logiciels libres pour les bibliothèques
BibLibre, Open Source software and services for libraries

_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : https://www.koha-community.org/
git : https://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : https://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to