Hi Marcel, Sorry for the late reply. All looks ok to me as well, only a couple of things:
15b: better to point to C4 than c/p code from there to Koha :) Ideally the code should be moved to Koha, then used from there. But no always a solution I guess. 15c: On 22407 comment 3 I listed the different cases of the relationship, and how we should use them. ie. no "return unless" if not necessary, etc. I think they could be copied to the wiki as an example to follow https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22407#c3 And a question about 15a, what could be a good reason to not use OOP in Koha? Thanks! Jonathan Le mer. 29 janv. 2020 à 17:24, Marcel de Rooy <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> a écrit : > Referring to the dev meeting and bug 22407, I propose the following > rewording: > > PERL15 Using Koha::Object[s] > PERL15(a) Code added to the Koha:: namespace should be object-oriented > unless there is a very good reason to do otherwise. In that case the reason > should be documented clearly. > PERL15(b) Code in Koha::Object[s] should normally not refer back to C4. > Obviously, this cannot be enforced harshly until the refactoring has been > completed. > PERL15(c) Use DBIC relations to (pre)fetch a related Koha object rather > than searching it explicitly. (See bug 22407) > > > PERL28 Other object oriented code guidelines (in addition to PERL15) > I think we need to move the Accessor and idiom for -> new rules from > PERL15 to another rule. I opened rule 28 for that depending on discussing > the following: > Class::Accessor is a great way to provide access to member variables. > => My suggestion would be to remove this rule. It is true but we do not > say that it is the only way to do it. (We are not even using > Class::Accessor in Koha objects.) > Or just say PERL28(a) To provide access to member variables, there are > several ways including but not limited to using Class::Accessor. > > A useful idiom for the ->new() routine in object-oriented classes that do > not need to process the arguments passed in as a hashref but merely need to > save them for future processing > => This suggestion is fine. It says use a parameter hash for sub new. We > normally do that. Reworded: > PERL 28(b) Use a hashref as second parameter in sub new when passing > arguments. > > Any feedback? > > Marcel > > [image: http://www.rijksmuseum.nl] <http://www.rijksmuseum.nl/> > > Museumstraat 1 > Postbus 74888 > 1070 DN Amsterdam > *Rijksmuseum.nl* <http://www.rijksmuseum.nl/> > > Nu te zien: > *Operatie Nachtwacht* <https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/nachtwacht> > > Verwacht: > *Caravaggio-Bernini. Barok in Rome* > <https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/caravaggio-bernini> > *Dankzij Waller 2010-2020* > <https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/nu-in-het-museum/tentoonstellingen-verwacht/dankzij-waller-2010-2020> > > > T/m 18 jaar gratis > > Please think before you print > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org > https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/