Le 19/09/2018 à 16:44, Marcel de Rooy a écrit : >> Should we replace Signed-off-by by Tested-By (for testers) and Reviewed-By >>(for QA) ? >> Should we use Signed-off-by as suggested in the git-commit manpage ? > Bit late in the project to make this change imo? But yes, our > interpretation is quite different ;) But it's never too late to make a positive change, right ? :)
> If we should switch to Tested-by and Reviewed-by (note: lowercase by), > we should better start at a version release? Probably, this would make it easier to distinguish between the two different meanings of Signed-off-by in the git history. That means all 'Signed off' patches would have to be rewritten after that release. A bit tedious but not impossible. > If so, what about the Bugzilla status Signed off etc. I hadn't thought of that. Can the status be renamed easily ? git-bz would need to be updated as well (and maybe other tools ?). -- Julian Maurice <julian.maur...@biblibre.com> BibLibre _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
