On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Jonathan Druart <jonathan.dru...@bugs.koha-community.org> wrote: > I would not expect a QAer to be paid (by the sponsor of the enh) to review a > patch, I'd call that more corruption / conflict of interest than sponsoring :)
Ah. Hadn't thought of it that way. Good point. Not sure there's an easy way around that one, even if the QAer is paid directly by the sponsor. I suppose that's the nature of incentives -- they produce changes in behavior that wouldn't happen otherwise, a process that can be "innocent" or corrupt ... Thanks, Cab _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
