Positive captchas are still discrimatory. The reasons for not using them are as
valid now as they were then.
I guess the question is would you rather discriminate against potential or
current users or deal with the spam. Long winded way of me saying we should
find a better tool than positive captchas or deal with the spam.
My 2 cents
Chris
On 3 February 2016 4:09:53 pm AEDT, David Cook <dc...@prosentient.com.au> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>
>
>It looks like we may need to improve anti-spam for opac-suggestions.pl.
>
>
>
>A negative captcha was added with
>https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3144, but I'm
>noticing a distributed spam attack which appears to either be wise to
>the
>"negcap" field or is occasionally lucky to accidentally not put any
>data
>with that parameter.
>
>
>
>Back in the day, we decided not to go with a positive captcha for
>accessibility reasons. I suppose we do have a positive captcha in the
>patron
>self-registration (I think) so maybe we should add one here. Or. think
>of
>something else clever.
>
>
>
>Ideas?
>
>
>
>David Cook
>
>Systems Librarian
>
>Prosentient Systems
>
>72/330 Wattle St, Ultimo, NSW 2007
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Koha-devel mailing list
>Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
>http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
>website : http://www.koha-community.org/
>git : http://git.koha-community.org/
>bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
