If you mean the syspref, I agree we could remove it. Regarding the itemtype "calculation", we shoudl just use Koha::Item->effective_itemtype all over the place, well, and Koha::Item(s) heh.
2015-12-11 9:04 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Druart < jonathan.dru...@bugs.koha-community.org>: > Hi devs, > > Friday is a good day for this kind of questions, fasten your seat belt > for a time travel. > > As many of you know, the item type is not correctly managed all around > the different Koha modules. Sometimes it's, sometimes it's not. > The main issue is that we deal with it at too many places and the code > is not clean/centralised at all. > > So I have searched for previous discussions on this subject and I have > found this "Abandoned RFC" on the wiki : > > http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Mandate_item-level_circulation_rules_RFC > filled from this koha-devel thread > > http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/2008-October/031144.html > > The questions are: > 1/ Is this still valid? > 2/ Is there something missing in the different steps described? > 3/ Does someone have some other suggestions to do? > > I would be happy to provide this change but first I would like to get > confirmation about it and get people involved in signoffing/QAing the > possible patch set. > > Cheers, > Jonathan > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Tomás Cohen Arazi Theke Solutions (http://theke.io) ✆ +54 9351 3513384 GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
