I vote for 4) - for the same reason.
Am 28.09.2015 um 23:31 schrieb Katrin Fischer: > I'd vote 4) - mostly for the reason of 'not yet another account > somewhere' and to have all things Koha in one place. > > Am 28.09.2015 um 22:43 schrieb Mason James: >> Hi Folks >> >> Jonathan and I are planning to use an bug/issue tracker for the >> koha-qa.pl tool >> We thought it would be a good idea to get some opinions from other Koha >> developers, on which tracker to use >> >> here is the list we currently have... >> >> 1/ use github.com >> 2/ use gitlab.com >> 3/ use a KC.org gitlab server (can someone provide a 2gig server?) >> 4/ use current KC.org bugzilla >> 6/ something else...? >> >> >> any opinions? >> >> Mason >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha-devel mailing list >> Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org >> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >> > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
