I think what would be more helpful than yet another status is consensus about when to change it and who does it. Often someone does not want to sign off for reasons found in the comments, but also does not want to keep others from doing it, so needs signoff is kept. Then the next 20 people come and see the discussion, so they don't sign off because someone had objections.
So there should be a rule when to change it. Do I change it when I raise concerns? Should the next person change it that agrees not to sign off? Should it be done after a certain period of time? (something that bug wranglers could check regularly maybe) There has to be a signal to the submitter that s/he has to do something (react to comments, submit another version, maybe something else) instead of keeping needs signoff for months. Let's not have more options to not change the status to, but agree on when to change it. _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
